CAD Application
Testing Services

Turn designs into reality: flawless CAD applications for streamlined workflows.

Locations

Years of experience

250+

Software QA engineers

200+

Integrations into an existing development & testing process

300+

Projects tested from scratch

50+

Reviews on

Did you know that a staggering 88% of engineering errors stem from flawed CAD designs? In modern complex projects, even the smallest overlooked detail can lead to costly delays, rework, and compromised quality.

Our team of seasoned QA experts specializes in comprehensive CAD application testing. We meticulously examine every aspect of your design software to uncover potential flaws and ensure its seamless operation. From geometric accuracy to compatibility across platforms, we leave no stone unturned to guarantee the unmatched quality of your CAD applications.

What Features Need To Be Tested?

Intuitive modeling features

Scalable component libraries

Real-time visualization of the changes made

Modification management

Digital chain automation

Cross-platform security

User guide

UI/UX

Performance

Localization

Our Solutions For Your CAD Application Testing Challenges

Many teams face hurdles related to testing that slow down their development process. Here, we tackle common CAD application testing challenges and showcase how our solutions can get you back on track:

Ensuring Accuracy and Precision

Challenge

Millimeters matter. Inaccuracies in your CAD models can lead to costly manufacturing errors down the line. Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human oversight.

Solution

Our automated testing tools leverage advanced geometric analysis to identify even the slightest deviations from design specifications. This ensures pixel-perfect accuracy and saves you valuable time.

Keeping Pace with Design Iterations

Challenge

The design process is fluid. Keeping up with constant revisions and updates requires a testing approach that adapts quickly. Traditional testing methods can struggle with this rapid iteration cycle.

Solution

We offer a modular testing framework that scales seamlessly with your project. Our test scripts are reusable and adaptable, allowing you to integrate testing seamlessly into your design workflow.

Maintaining Consistency Across Platforms

Challenge

Your designs need to be translated flawlessly across different operating systems and hardware configurations. Testing on every potential platform can be a real nightmare.

Solution

We utilize cloud-based testing environments that replicate diverse system configurations. This allows us to ensure consistent performance and functionality across the board.

Identifying Performance Bottlenecks

Challenge

Sluggish software performance can significantly hinder your productivity. Manually pinpointing performance issues within complex CAD applications can be like finding a needle in a haystack.

Solution

Our automated performance testing solutions provide in-depth analysis, pinpointing areas that slow down your software. This allows us to optimize your CAD application for maximum efficiency.

Ensuring Accuracy and Precision

Challenge

Millimeters matter. Inaccuracies in your CAD models can lead to costly manufacturing errors down the line. Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human oversight.

Solution

Our automated testing tools leverage advanced geometric analysis to identify even the slightest deviations from design specifications. This ensures pixel-perfect accuracy and saves you valuable time.

Keeping Pace with Design Iterations

Challenge

The design process is fluid. Keeping up with constant revisions and updates requires a testing approach that adapts quickly. Traditional testing methods can struggle with this rapid iteration cycle.

Solution

We offer a modular testing framework that scales seamlessly with your project. Our test scripts are reusable and adaptable, allowing you to integrate testing seamlessly into your design workflow.

Maintaining Consistency Across Platforms

Challenge

Your designs need to be translated flawlessly across different operating systems and hardware configurations. Testing on every potential platform can be a real nightmare.

Solution

We utilize cloud-based testing environments that replicate diverse system configurations. This allows us to ensure consistent performance and functionality across the board.

Identifying Performance Bottlenecks

Challenge

Sluggish software performance can significantly hinder your productivity. Manually pinpointing performance issues within complex CAD applications can be like finding a needle in a haystack.

Solution

Our automated performance testing solutions provide in-depth analysis, pinpointing areas that slow down your software. This allows us to optimize your CAD application for maximum efficiency.

Ensuring Accuracy and Precision

Challenge

Millimeters matter. Inaccuracies in your CAD models can lead to costly manufacturing errors down the line. Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human oversight.

Solution

Our automated testing tools leverage advanced geometric analysis to identify even the slightest deviations from design specifications. This ensures pixel-perfect accuracy and saves you valuable time.

Keeping Pace with Design Iterations

Challenge

The design process is fluid. Keeping up with constant revisions and updates requires a testing approach that adapts quickly. Traditional testing methods can struggle with this rapid iteration cycle.

Solution

We offer a modular testing framework that scales seamlessly with your project. Our test scripts are reusable and adaptable, allowing you to integrate testing seamlessly into your design workflow.

Maintaining Consistency Across Platforms

Challenge

Your designs need to be translated flawlessly across different operating systems and hardware configurations. Testing on every potential platform can be a real nightmare.

Solution

We utilize cloud-based testing environments that replicate diverse system configurations. This allows us to ensure consistent performance and functionality across the board.

Identifying Performance Bottlenecks

Challenge

Sluggish software performance can significantly hinder your productivity. Manually pinpointing performance issues within complex CAD applications can be like finding a needle in a haystack.

Solution

Our automated performance testing solutions provide in-depth analysis, pinpointing areas that slow down your software. This allows us to optimize your CAD application for maximum efficiency.

Our Scope of CAD Application Testing Services

We understand the critical role that CAD software plays in projects. That's why we offer a comprehensive range of CAD application testing services to ensure the smooth functioning and optimal performance of your CAD applications.

Functional Testing

From basic drawing functions to advanced modeling capabilities, we leave no stone unturned to ensure that your CAD software operates flawlessly.

Compatibility Testing

We check whether your CAD application works seamlessly across different platforms, guaranteeing a consistent user experience for all users.

Performance Testing

We execute performance testing to evaluate the speed, stability, and scalability of your CAD software, ensuring optimal performance even under heavy workloads.

Usability Testing

Our usability testing evaluates the intuitiveness of user interfaces, ease of navigation, and overall user experience to identify areas for improvement and optimization.

Regression Testing

Our team executes regression testing to systematically check each component of your CAD software, detect any regressions, and maintain overall software integrity.

UI/UX Testing

We focus on evaluating the visual appeal, functionality, and ease of use of your CAD software interface.

Localization Testing

Our experts verify that all UI elements, features, and functionalities are properly translated and culturally adapted to ensure that CAD software functions accurately and effectively across different languages, cultures, and regions.

Partner with DeviQA: see the difference

Test coverage :

90%

Before

After

2.5 weeks to run regression testing

1 day to run regression testing

7 days to run smoke testing

1 day to run smoke testing

Outdated test cases

60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases

50% test coverage

90% test coverage

Supported localizations were not tested

27 localizations supported by QA engineers

No automation testing

>1500 automated test scenarios created

Read Story

Test coverage :

97%

Before

After

Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities

Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release

The lack of test documentation

Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable

No Automation test coverage

Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times

Read Story

Releases per day:

Before

After

1 huge release every 1-2 months

4-5 releases per day

1 large team with an unclear scope of work

~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan

0 test cases

200+ e2e test cases for the whole app

1-2 months to release a new feature

2 weeks max to release a new feature

Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases

Clear and fast way to release any fix

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests

Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch

Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools

Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running

Tests took many hours to be completed

Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines

Read Story

Test coverage:

80%

Before

After

Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind

We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices

The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software

The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented

Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities

SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities

Read Story

Supported platforms:

Before

After

Developers were responsible for testing, and they executed it chaotically

>90% of the application was covered with test cases

Many bugs were overlooked during regular test runs

100% coverage was ensured for smoke and sanity testing

There was a lack of test documentation

>300 blocker issues were detected

There were many major and critical issues in a production environment

The number of customer support issues was reduced by more than 50%

Read Story

Parallel threads:

Before

After

Outdated BE autotests

All existing autotests are up-to-date

Only smoke tests were automated on BE

~2800 autotests added

No autotests on FE

>90% of test cases are automated

Manual smoke testing on FE

~99% of smoke tests are automated

Manual release testing

~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch

There was no test documentation

Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios

Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality

Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern

Read Story

Test coverage:

>80%

Before

After

4 days were needed to run regression testing

~2 hours were needed to run regression testing

Regression tests were executed on one device only

5 various devices with different operating systems, screen resolutions, and browsers were used to run regression testing

There were less than 200 automated tests

>1000 automated tests were developed

1 browser was used

4 browsers were supported

Read Story

Test coverage:

99%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

Manual story testing and verification was built from scratch

There was a lack of QA resources to test all platforms and product areas

99% of the application was covered with test cases and the smoke and regression checklists

The test documentation was incomplete

A well-structured test plan enabling thorough validation was created

Testing was executed by developers

A fully autonomous QA process was set up where QA engineers were fully responsible for testing

Read Story

Regression testing run:

Before

After

2 weeks were needed to run regression testing

<1 week is needed to run regression testing

Regression testing was performed only on 2 web devices

>6 various devices with the latest OS versions are used to run regression testing

There were no auto-tests

>150 automated tests have been created

>100 bugs have been reported

3 browsers are supported

2x faster task handling

Read Story

Test coverage:

>85%

Before

After

Regression testing was not executed

3 hours were needed to complete regression testing

The product contained a lot of bugs and had a bad UX

>300 functional and non-functional bugs were reported

There were no automated tests

350+ automation scenarios were created

Test coverage was low

>85% of the product was covered with automated tests

There were no test cases

350+ test cases were created from scratch

Read Story

Bugs reported:

>1000

Before

After

The QA process was unstructured and inconsistent

A QA team participates in creating ticket scope for upcoming releases

The previous QA team was not efficient enough

All the required test documentation has been rewritten

The test documentation was incomplete and out of date

>6,000 test cases have been written for a regression test suite for client applications

There were a lot of issues reported by clients

The DeviQA engineers have reduced the number of bugs reported by clients/therapists

Read Story

Test coverage of the API:

100%

Before

After

A bug-tracking system was not used

280+ regression E2EE cases have been created, which let a team reduce the time of regression testing to 1.5 days

There were no regression checklists

~40% of tests have been automated, and this value is growing

There was poor documentation coverage

100% of the core flow is covered with documentation

The tests were not automated

5+ performance suites have been created

Read Story

Test coverage :

90%

Before

After

2.5 weeks to run regression testing

1 day to run regression testing

7 days to run smoke testing

1 day to run smoke testing

Outdated test cases

60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases

50% test coverage

90% test coverage

Supported localizations were not tested

27 localizations supported by QA engineers

No automation testing

>1500 automated test scenarios created

Read Story

Dev capacity:

+15%

Before

After

Didn’t have a formal QA process

Built smooth and well-working processes

Didn’t make automated testing

Test automation : smoke, API, UI on all supported browsers

Testing was carried out by the devs

Full coverage of the application by test cases

Read Story

Test coverage :

97%

Before

After

Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities

Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release

The lack of test documentation

Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable

No Automation test coverage

Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times

Read Story

Releases per day:

Before

After

1 huge release every 1-2 months

4-5 releases per day

1 large team with an unclear scope of work

~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan

0 test cases

200+ e2e test cases for the whole app

1-2 months to release a new feature

2 weeks max to release a new feature

Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases

Clear and fast way to release any fix

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests

Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch

Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools

Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running

Tests took many hours to be completed

Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines

Read Story

Test coverage:

80%

Before

After

Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind

We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices

The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software

The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented

Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities

SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities

Read Story

Supported platforms:

Before

After

Developers were responsible for testing, and they executed it chaotically

>90% of the application was covered with test cases

Many bugs were overlooked during regular test runs

100% coverage was ensured for smoke and sanity testing

There was a lack of test documentation

>300 blocker issues were detected

There were many major and critical issues in a production environment

The number of customer support issues was reduced by more than 50%

Read Story

Parallel threads:

Before

After

Outdated BE autotests

All existing autotests are up-to-date

Only smoke tests were automated on BE

~2800 autotests added

No autotests on FE

>90% of test cases are automated

Manual smoke testing on FE

~99% of smoke tests are automated

Manual release testing

~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch

There was no test documentation

Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios

Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality

Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern

Read Story

Test coverage:

>80%

Before

After

4 days were needed to run regression testing

~2 hours were needed to run regression testing

Regression tests were executed on one device only

5 various devices with different operating systems, screen resolutions, and browsers were used to run regression testing

There were less than 200 automated tests

>1000 automated tests were developed

1 browser was used

4 browsers were supported

Read Story

Test coverage:

99%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

Manual story testing and verification was built from scratch

There was a lack of QA resources to test all platforms and product areas

99% of the application was covered with test cases and the smoke and regression checklists

The test documentation was incomplete

A well-structured test plan enabling thorough validation was created

Testing was executed by developers

A fully autonomous QA process was set up where QA engineers were fully responsible for testing

Read Story

Regression testing run:

Before

After

2 weeks were needed to run regression testing

<1 week is needed to run regression testing

Regression testing was performed only on 2 web devices

>6 various devices with the latest OS versions are used to run regression testing

There were no auto-tests

>150 automated tests have been created

>100 bugs have been reported

3 browsers are supported

2x faster task handling

Read Story

Test coverage:

>85%

Before

After

Regression testing was not executed

3 hours were needed to complete regression testing

The product contained a lot of bugs and had a bad UX

>300 functional and non-functional bugs were reported

There were no automated tests

350+ automation scenarios were created

Test coverage was low

>85% of the product was covered with automated tests

There were no test cases

350+ test cases were created from scratch

Read Story

Bugs reported:

>1000

Before

After

The QA process was unstructured and inconsistent

A QA team participates in creating ticket scope for upcoming releases

The previous QA team was not efficient enough

All the required test documentation has been rewritten

The test documentation was incomplete and out of date

>6,000 test cases have been written for a regression test suite for client applications

There were a lot of issues reported by clients

The DeviQA engineers have reduced the number of bugs reported by clients/therapists

Read Story

Test coverage of the API:

100%

Before

After

A bug-tracking system was not used

280+ regression E2EE cases have been created, which let a team reduce the time of regression testing to 1.5 days

There were no regression checklists

~40% of tests have been automated, and this value is growing

There was poor documentation coverage

100% of the core flow is covered with documentation

The tests were not automated

5+ performance suites have been created

Read Story

Test coverage :

90%

Before

After

2.5 weeks to run regression testing

1 day to run regression testing

7 days to run smoke testing

1 day to run smoke testing

Outdated test cases

60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases

50% test coverage

90% test coverage

Supported localizations were not tested

27 localizations supported by QA engineers

No automation testing

>1500 automated test scenarios created

Read Story

Test coverage :

97%

Before

After

Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities

Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release

The lack of test documentation

Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable

No Automation test coverage

Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times

Read Story

Releases per day:

Before

After

1 huge release every 1-2 months

4-5 releases per day

1 large team with an unclear scope of work

~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan

0 test cases

200+ e2e test cases for the whole app

1-2 months to release a new feature

2 weeks max to release a new feature

Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases

Clear and fast way to release any fix

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests

Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch

Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools

Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running

Tests took many hours to be completed

Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines

Read Story

Test coverage:

80%

Before

After

Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind

We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices

The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software

The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented

Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities

SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities

Read Story

Supported platforms:

Before

After

Developers were responsible for testing, and they executed it chaotically

>90% of the application was covered with test cases

Many bugs were overlooked during regular test runs

100% coverage was ensured for smoke and sanity testing

There was a lack of test documentation

>300 blocker issues were detected

There were many major and critical issues in a production environment

The number of customer support issues was reduced by more than 50%

Read Story

Parallel threads:

Before

After

Outdated BE autotests

All existing autotests are up-to-date

Only smoke tests were automated on BE

~2800 autotests added

No autotests on FE

>90% of test cases are automated

Manual smoke testing on FE

~99% of smoke tests are automated

Manual release testing

~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch

There was no test documentation

Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios

Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality

Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern

Read Story

Test coverage:

>80%

Before

After

4 days were needed to run regression testing

~2 hours were needed to run regression testing

Regression tests were executed on one device only

5 various devices with different operating systems, screen resolutions, and browsers were used to run regression testing

There were less than 200 automated tests

>1000 automated tests were developed

1 browser was used

4 browsers were supported

Read Story

Test coverage:

99%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

Manual story testing and verification was built from scratch

There was a lack of QA resources to test all platforms and product areas

99% of the application was covered with test cases and the smoke and regression checklists

The test documentation was incomplete

A well-structured test plan enabling thorough validation was created

Testing was executed by developers

A fully autonomous QA process was set up where QA engineers were fully responsible for testing

Read Story

Regression testing run:

Before

After

2 weeks were needed to run regression testing

<1 week is needed to run regression testing

Regression testing was performed only on 2 web devices

>6 various devices with the latest OS versions are used to run regression testing

There were no auto-tests

>150 automated tests have been created

>100 bugs have been reported

3 browsers are supported

2x faster task handling

Read Story

Test coverage:

>85%

Before

After

Regression testing was not executed

3 hours were needed to complete regression testing

The product contained a lot of bugs and had a bad UX

>300 functional and non-functional bugs were reported

There were no automated tests

350+ automation scenarios were created

Test coverage was low

>85% of the product was covered with automated tests

There were no test cases

350+ test cases were created from scratch

Read Story

Bugs reported:

>1000

Before

After

The QA process was unstructured and inconsistent

A QA team participates in creating ticket scope for upcoming releases

The previous QA team was not efficient enough

All the required test documentation has been rewritten

The test documentation was incomplete and out of date

>6,000 test cases have been written for a regression test suite for client applications

There were a lot of issues reported by clients

The DeviQA engineers have reduced the number of bugs reported by clients/therapists

Read Story

Test coverage of the API:

100%

Before

After

A bug-tracking system was not used

280+ regression E2EE cases have been created, which let a team reduce the time of regression testing to 1.5 days

There were no regression checklists

~40% of tests have been automated, and this value is growing

There was poor documentation coverage

100% of the core flow is covered with documentation

The tests were not automated

5+ performance suites have been created

Read Story

Choose Your Cooperation Model

Our tailored approach ensures that your unique needs are met efficiently and effectively. Explore our three cooperation models below, designed to match your requirements and exceed your expectations.

Staff Augmentation

Staff augmentation suggests supplementing your current team with external CAD testing specialists on a temporary basis.

Best Option For: Projects with varying workloads or those requiring specialized skills for short-term engagements.
Cost-effective solution without the overhead of hiring full-time employees.
Access to niche skills and expertise to address specific project needs.
Enhanced productivity and efficiency through the infusion of additional talent.

Get started

Dedicated Team

A dedicated QA team operates as an extension of your in-house resources, ensuring a cohesive approach and alignment with your project goals.

Best Option For: Long-term projects with complex testing requirements, where maintaining consistent quality and control is paramount.
Direct oversight and control over the team's activities and work progress.
Rich expertise and specialized skill sets tailored to your project requirements.
Adherence to your existing workflows and processes.

Get started

Outsourcing

Outsourcing allows you to leverage the expertise of seasoned professionals and access a broader talent pool while focusing on your core business objectives.

Best Option For: Projects requiring rapid scalability and access to specialized resources, or projects seeking to offload non-core tasks.
Cost reduction due to the elimination of the need for infrastructure and resource overhead.
Access to a diverse range of skilled professionals and cutting-edge testing technologies.
Streamlined processes and accelerated project delivery.

Get started

What you get

Average time saved by implementing our multithreaded test automation

300%

Reduction in your costs by using outsourced software testing

60%

Improvement in time to market for your products and projects

35%

Accelerate development by

30%

Increase test coverage to

95%

Enhancing project quality by

60%

Feel the improvement in

3 days

Reduce bugs up to

87%

Automation faster in parallel by

56x

We serve

Our extensive expertise and resources let us serve not only CAD companies but a great variety of other businesses, empowering them to deliver groundbreaking software solutions.

Industries

Healthcare

FinTech

Real Estate

Cybersecurity

Retail

AdTech

Solutions

Banking Apps

SaaS Solutions

ERP Software

CRM Systems

eCommerce

Technologies

Blockchain

Cloud Computing

Internet of Things

Big Data

Here’s what people are saying about DeviQA

“It was so easy to integrate your people with us and we didn't have any problems.”

Janosch Greber

VP of Engineering at RealTyme

“DeviQA did an excellent job, and I highly recommend them.“

DeviQA helped develop a cybersecurity software platform. Complex automated scenarios test REST APIs through a Faraday library. An SDK application works with Azure, Google Cloud, Docker, and LXC containers.

Yuval Or

QA Manager at Mimecast

Open details

“Devico has always brought us really high quality candidates for us to be able to seamlessly mesh into our team.”

Danny He

CEO and Founder at Soapbox

QA tools & platforms we hold expertise in

Automation Testing

Cucumber

Selenium

Appium

Mocha

Playwright

Robot Framework

Specflow

TestNG

WebdriverIO

Selenide

Calabash

Watir

Codeception

Cypress

Security Testing Tools

HCL AppScan

Nessus

NMAP

BurpSuite

Acunetix

OWASP ZAP

Metasploit

Wireshark

DBeaver

Rdp-Sec-Check

SNMPCHECK

AiR

SSLSCAN

Performance Testing Tools

JMeter

Load Runner

Visual Studio

API Testing

Rest API

GraphQL

Apiary

Bluetooth Low Energy API

Apple Pay

Google Pay

Apple Maps

Fingerprint API

API Testing Tools

Postman

Swagger

Charles Proxy

Ready API

ACCELQ

Katalon Platform

REST-Assured

Database Testing

SQL Server

MySQL

Oracle

PostgreSQL

Cassandra

MongoDB

RethinkDB

Amazon S3

Redshift

DynamoDB

Amazon RDS

DocumentDB

Amplify

Lambda

Amazon EC2

Elasticache

Azure Datalake

Blob Storage

CosmosDB

SQL Database

Synapse Analytics

Google Cloud SQL

Google Cloud Datastore

Book a call to deliver designs ready for smooth manufacturing

Certifications

ISO 9001:2015

At DeviQA, we take pride in being an ISO 9001:2015 certified company. This certification represents our unwavering commitment to maintaining the highest standards of quality in every aspect of our software testing services. With a focus on customer satisfaction, we adhere to internationally recognized quality management practices to ensure that our clients receive exceptional and reliable testing solutions. Through continuous improvement and compliance with regulatory requirements, we consistently deliver top-notch testing services that exceed our clients' expectations

ISO 20000

We understand the crucial role of IT services in modern businesses. As an ISO 20000 certified company, we excel in delivering efficient and effective IT services to our clients. Our customer-centric approach enables us to tailor our testing solutions to suit your unique requirements, ensuring a seamless integration of testing processes into your software development lifecycle. With a focus on continual service improvement, we optimize our IT Service Management practices to guarantee a smooth and satisfying experience for our valued clients

ISO 27001

The security of our clients' data is of paramount importance to us. As an ISO 27001 certified company, we go above and beyond to protect sensitive information and ensure the confidentiality and integrity of all data entrusted to us. With our robust Information Security Management System (ISMS), we implement stringent security controls, evaluate risks, and take proactive measures to safeguard against potential threats. Rest assured that partnering with us means your valuable data is handled with the utmost care and subject to the highest security standards

ISTQB

As a testament to our team's expertise and commitment to excellence, our software testing professionals hold the esteemed ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) certifications. The ISTQB certification is a globally recognized standard for software testing professionals, signifying their proficiency in the latest testing methodologies, best practices, and industry standards. With ISTQB-certified experts on board, we bring a wealth of knowledge and skills to every testing project, ensuring thorough and precise testing to uncover even the most intricate software defects. Partner with us and benefit from our skilled ISTQB-certified professionals who are dedicated to elevating the quality and reliability of your software products

Awards and recognitions

Leading Testing Provider by SoftwareTestingNews in 2021

Top Software Testing and QA Company by Superbcompanies in 2023

Finalist of the European Testing Awards in 2019

Finalist of the Software Testing & QA Awards in 2019

Collaboration process overview

1. Initial contact

During our initial call, we aim to understand your testing requirements and goals

2. Assessment

We evaluate your current testing process and create a tailored plan to enhance it

3. Proof of Concept

We offer a complimentary Proof of Concept, allowing you to experience our proficiency and expertise

4. Trial and evaluation of performance

We start a trial period with you, and once complete, we review the results together and discuss options

5. Contract signing and full-scale QA implementation

Upon mutual agreement, we move forward with the QA process by signing a contract and beginning work

6. Partnership with flexibility

Our engagement options give you commercial flexibility to dial up and dial down resources depending on your own needs

Let’s schedule a call

Flexible collaboration options allow you to choose the level of support that best meets your needs

Frequently Asked Questions

faq

FAQ

What is CAD application testing, and why is it important?

CAD application testing involves evaluating computer-aided design (CAD) software to ensure that its functionality, performance, and reliability meet the required standards. It's crucial because errors or glitches in CAD software can lead to costly mistakes in design and production processes, impacting product quality and deadlines.

What specific aspects of CAD applications are tested?

CAD application testing covers various aspects such as functionality (drawing tools, editing capabilities, etc.), compatibility (different operating systems, browsers, or hardware), performance (speed, scalability, and responsiveness), security (data protection), and usability (user interface and experience).

What are the peculiarities of CAD application testing?

CAD application testing requires specialized knowledge of engineering design principles, industry standards (e.g., ISO, ANSI), and specific CAD software functionalities. Test scenarios are tailored to mimic real-world design scenarios, considering factors like geometric complexity and precision.

What are the benefits of outsourcing CAD application testing services?

By outsourcing CAD application testing, you can reap different benefits, such as access to domain expertise, cost-effectiveness, especially compared to in-house testing teams, flexibility to ramp a team up or down based on project requirements, and unbiased quality evaluation by third-party experts.

What level of customization can be expected from CAD application testing services?

CAD application testing services can be tailored to meet specific project requirements, business goals, and budget constraints. Whether it's executing regression testing for software updates or validating custom plugins or extensions, providers offer flexible solutions to address unique client needs.

How can I determine the ROI of investing in CAD application testing?

The ROI of investing in CAD application testing can be measured by factors like reduced rework costs, improved productivity, minimized design errors, enhanced user satisfaction, and compliance with regulatory standards. A thorough cost-benefit analysis can help quantify the tangible and intangible returns on investment.