QA Control and Advisory Services

Get tired of quality chaos? We'll calm the storm. DeviQA is your one-stop shop for QA control.

Locations

Years of experience

250+

Software QA engineers

200+

Integrations into an existing development & testing process

300+

Projects tested from scratch

50+

Reviews on

Ensuring the reliability, efficiency, and compliance of QA processes has become paramount. QA control and advisory play a pivotal role in mitigating potential risks, optimizing operational workflows, and elevating overall quality standards. From efficient testing methodology implementation to proactive advisory support, QA control and advisory services empower businesses to confidently navigate the complexities of software testing.

When Do You Need QA Control and Advisory Services?

Absence of specialized QA knowledge within your team, and you need to bring in real QA experts to ensure your software meets high standards.

You want to set up strong QA processes from the start to avoid expensive mistakes later on.

Your company is undergoing a digital transformation and needs to mitigate risks and ensure high-quality digital experiences.

You are looking to get an objective assessment of existing QA processes and improve product quality and efficiency.

You are not satisfied with the current quality of your product and the abundance of bugs reported by your customers.

If there's a significant increase in development time and costs due to inefficient or redundant testing processes.

Our Approach to QA Control and Advisory Services

With our holistic approach to QA control and advisory services, you can rest assured that your projects will meet the highest quality, reliability, and performance standards.

Strategic Analysis

We begin by conducting a thorough analysis of your current QA processes, approaches, and methodologies to understand your unique challenges and opportunities.

Strategy Design

Based on our analysis, we design a tailored QA strategy that aligns with your business objectives.

Testing Process Optimization

We streamline and optimize your testing processes, leveraging industry best practices and cutting-edge technologies to enhance efficiency and reduce costs.

Risk Management

Our team identifies and mitigates potential risks proactively, ensuring that your software products are delivered on time and within budget without compromising quality.

Monitoring and Reporting

DeviQA provides ongoing monitoring and reporting, offering transparent insights and actionable recommendations for improvement.

Education and Development

We empower your team with the knowledge and skills they need to excel in QA. Through targeted education and training programs, we help cultivate a culture of quality throughout your organization.

Continuous Improvement

We remain committed to supporting you in refining and optimizing your QA processes, driving continuous improvement and innovation.

Our Solutions for Challenges Associated with Quality Assurance

We recognize the complexities that come with quality assurance. A proactive approach is needed to overcome the challenges that may hinder your business growth.

Inconsistent Quality Standards

Challenge

Maintaining uniform quality standards across diverse projects and teams can be a daunting task. Variations in processes and methodologies often lead to inconsistencies, impacting overall quality control.

Solution

DeviQA conducts a comprehensive assessment of your current quality standards. Then, we streamline processes, implement standardized protocols, and provide ongoing support to ensure consistent quality across your organization.

Regulatory Compliance Complexities

Challenge

Compliance with complex and constantly changing regulatory requirements poses a significant challenge. Non-compliance, in turn, can result in severe legal and financial consequences, affecting your business operation, brand reputation, and bottom line.

Solution

Staying up-to-date with changes in industry regulations, our team of experts conducts regular audits, offers strategic advisory services, and provides real-time updates, ensuring your organization remains compliant and resilient in the face of regulatory changes.

Lack of Scalability in QA Processes

Challenge

As your business expands, scalability becomes crucial. Traditional QA processes may struggle to adapt, leading to bottlenecks, delays, and a decline in overall efficiency.

Solution

At DeviQA, we analyze your current processes, implement scalable frameworks, and introduce automation where necessary. This ensures that your QA processes remain agile and efficient, regardless of the scale of your operations.

Inadequate Risk Management

Challenge

Identifying and mitigating potential risks in the QA process is essential for long-term success. Inadequate risk management can lead to project delays, cost overruns, and compromised deliverables.

Solution

Our QA control and advisory services offer the integration of robust risk management strategies. We conduct thorough risk assessments, develop risk mitigation plans, and provide ongoing advisory support to minimize risks and enhance project success rates.

Inconsistent Quality Standards

Challenge

Solution

Regulatory Compliance Complexities

Challenge

Solution

Lack of Scalability in QA Processes

Challenge

As your business expands, scalability becomes crucial. Traditional QA processes may struggle to adapt, leading to bottlenecks, delays, and a decline in overall efficiency.

Solution

Inadequate Risk Management

Challenge

Identifying and mitigating potential risks in the QA process is essential for long-term success. Inadequate risk management can lead to project delays, cost overruns, and compromised deliverables.

Solution

Inconsistent Quality Standards

Challenge

Solution

Regulatory Compliance Complexities

Challenge

Solution

Lack of Scalability in QA Processes

Challenge

As your business expands, scalability becomes crucial. Traditional QA processes may struggle to adapt, leading to bottlenecks, delays, and a decline in overall efficiency.

Solution

Inadequate Risk Management

Challenge

Identifying and mitigating potential risks in the QA process is essential for long-term success. Inadequate risk management can lead to project delays, cost overruns, and compromised deliverables.

Solution

We serve

Our expertise and resources allow us to cover the unique needs of each project, ensuring the delivery of high-quality software that meets users’ requirements and business goals.

Industries

Healthcare

FinTech

Real Estate

Cybersecurity

Retail

AdTech

Solutions

Banking Apps

SaaS Solutions

ERP Software

CRM Systems

eCommerce

Technologies

Blockchain

Cloud Computing

Internet of Things

Big Data

Partner with DeviQA: see the difference

Test coverage :

90%

Before

After

2.5 weeks to run regression testing

1 day to run regression testing

7 days to run smoke testing

1 day to run smoke testing

Outdated test cases

60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases

50% test coverage

90% test coverage

Supported localizations were not tested

27 localizations supported by QA engineers

No automation testing

>1500 automated test scenarios created

Read Story

Test coverage :

97%

Before

After

Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities

Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release

The lack of test documentation

Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable

No Automation test coverage

Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times

Read Story

Releases per day:

Before

After

1 huge release every 1-2 months

4-5 releases per day

1 large team with an unclear scope of work

~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan

0 test cases

200+ e2e test cases for the whole app

1-2 months to release a new feature

2 weeks max to release a new feature

Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases

Clear and fast way to release any fix

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests

Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch

Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools

Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running

Tests took many hours to be completed

Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines

Read Story

Test coverage:

80%

Before

After

Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind

We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices

The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software

The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented

Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities

SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities

Read Story

Supported platforms:

Before

After

Developers were responsible for testing, and they executed it chaotically

>90% of the application was covered with test cases

Many bugs were overlooked during regular test runs

100% coverage was ensured for smoke and sanity testing

There was a lack of test documentation

>300 blocker issues were detected

There were many major and critical issues in a production environment

The number of customer support issues was reduced by more than 50%

Read Story

Parallel threads:

Before

After

Outdated BE autotests

All existing autotests are up-to-date

Only smoke tests were automated on BE

~2800 autotests added

No autotests on FE

>90% of test cases are automated

Manual smoke testing on FE

~99% of smoke tests are automated

Manual release testing

~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch

There was no test documentation

Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios

Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality

Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern

Read Story

Test coverage:

>80%

Before

After

4 days were needed to run regression testing

~2 hours were needed to run regression testing

Regression tests were executed on one device only

5 various devices with different operating systems, screen resolutions, and browsers were used to run regression testing

There were less than 200 automated tests

>1000 automated tests were developed

1 browser was used

4 browsers were supported

Read Story

Test coverage:

99%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

Manual story testing and verification was built from scratch

There was a lack of QA resources to test all platforms and product areas

99% of the application was covered with test cases and the smoke and regression checklists

The test documentation was incomplete

A well-structured test plan enabling thorough validation was created

Testing was executed by developers

A fully autonomous QA process was set up where QA engineers were fully responsible for testing

Read Story

Regression testing run:

Before

After

2 weeks were needed to run regression testing

<1 week is needed to run regression testing

Regression testing was performed only on 2 web devices

>6 various devices with the latest OS versions are used to run regression testing

There were no auto-tests

>150 automated tests have been created

>100 bugs have been reported

3 browsers are supported

2x faster task handling

Read Story

Test coverage:

>85%

Before

After

Regression testing was not executed

3 hours were needed to complete regression testing

The product contained a lot of bugs and had a bad UX

>300 functional and non-functional bugs were reported

There were no automated tests

350+ automation scenarios were created

Test coverage was low

>85% of the product was covered with automated tests

There were no test cases

350+ test cases were created from scratch

Read Story

Bugs reported:

>1000

Before

After

The QA process was unstructured and inconsistent

A QA team participates in creating ticket scope for upcoming releases

The previous QA team was not efficient enough

All the required test documentation has been rewritten

The test documentation was incomplete and out of date

>6,000 test cases have been written for a regression test suite for client applications

There were a lot of issues reported by clients

The DeviQA engineers have reduced the number of bugs reported by clients/therapists

Read Story

Test coverage of the API:

100%

Before

After

A bug-tracking system was not used

280+ regression E2EE cases have been created, which let a team reduce the time of regression testing to 1.5 days

There were no regression checklists

~40% of tests have been automated, and this value is growing

There was poor documentation coverage

100% of the core flow is covered with documentation

The tests were not automated

5+ performance suites have been created

Read Story

Test coverage :

90%

Before

After

2.5 weeks to run regression testing

1 day to run regression testing

7 days to run smoke testing

1 day to run smoke testing

Outdated test cases

60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases

50% test coverage

90% test coverage

Supported localizations were not tested

27 localizations supported by QA engineers

No automation testing

>1500 automated test scenarios created

Read Story

Dev capacity:

+15%

Before

After

Didn’t have a formal QA process

Built smooth and well-working processes

Didn’t make automated testing

Test automation : smoke, API, UI on all supported browsers

Testing was carried out by the devs

Full coverage of the application by test cases

Read Story

Test coverage :

97%

Before

After

Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities

Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release

The lack of test documentation

Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable

No Automation test coverage

Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times

Read Story

Releases per day:

Before

After

1 huge release every 1-2 months

4-5 releases per day

1 large team with an unclear scope of work

~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan

0 test cases

200+ e2e test cases for the whole app

1-2 months to release a new feature

2 weeks max to release a new feature

Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases

Clear and fast way to release any fix

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests

Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch

Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools

Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running

Tests took many hours to be completed

Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines

Read Story

Test coverage:

80%

Before

After

Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind

We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices

The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software

The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented

Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities

SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities

Read Story

Supported platforms:

Before

After

Developers were responsible for testing, and they executed it chaotically

>90% of the application was covered with test cases

Many bugs were overlooked during regular test runs

100% coverage was ensured for smoke and sanity testing

There was a lack of test documentation

>300 blocker issues were detected

There were many major and critical issues in a production environment

The number of customer support issues was reduced by more than 50%

Read Story

Parallel threads:

Before

After

Outdated BE autotests

All existing autotests are up-to-date

Only smoke tests were automated on BE

~2800 autotests added

No autotests on FE

>90% of test cases are automated

Manual smoke testing on FE

~99% of smoke tests are automated

Manual release testing

~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch

There was no test documentation

Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios

Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality

Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern

Read Story

Test coverage:

>80%

Before

After

4 days were needed to run regression testing

~2 hours were needed to run regression testing

Regression tests were executed on one device only

5 various devices with different operating systems, screen resolutions, and browsers were used to run regression testing

There were less than 200 automated tests

>1000 automated tests were developed

1 browser was used

4 browsers were supported

Read Story

Test coverage:

99%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

Manual story testing and verification was built from scratch

There was a lack of QA resources to test all platforms and product areas

99% of the application was covered with test cases and the smoke and regression checklists

The test documentation was incomplete

A well-structured test plan enabling thorough validation was created

Testing was executed by developers

A fully autonomous QA process was set up where QA engineers were fully responsible for testing

Read Story

Regression testing run:

Before

After

2 weeks were needed to run regression testing

<1 week is needed to run regression testing

Regression testing was performed only on 2 web devices

>6 various devices with the latest OS versions are used to run regression testing

There were no auto-tests

>150 automated tests have been created

>100 bugs have been reported

3 browsers are supported

2x faster task handling

Read Story

Test coverage:

>85%

Before

After

Regression testing was not executed

3 hours were needed to complete regression testing

The product contained a lot of bugs and had a bad UX

>300 functional and non-functional bugs were reported

There were no automated tests

350+ automation scenarios were created

Test coverage was low

>85% of the product was covered with automated tests

There were no test cases

350+ test cases were created from scratch

Read Story

Bugs reported:

>1000

Before

After

The QA process was unstructured and inconsistent

A QA team participates in creating ticket scope for upcoming releases

The previous QA team was not efficient enough

All the required test documentation has been rewritten

The test documentation was incomplete and out of date

>6,000 test cases have been written for a regression test suite for client applications

There were a lot of issues reported by clients

The DeviQA engineers have reduced the number of bugs reported by clients/therapists

Read Story

Test coverage of the API:

100%

Before

After

A bug-tracking system was not used

280+ regression E2EE cases have been created, which let a team reduce the time of regression testing to 1.5 days

There were no regression checklists

~40% of tests have been automated, and this value is growing

There was poor documentation coverage

100% of the core flow is covered with documentation

The tests were not automated

5+ performance suites have been created

Read Story

Test coverage :

90%

Before

After

2.5 weeks to run regression testing

1 day to run regression testing

7 days to run smoke testing

1 day to run smoke testing

Outdated test cases

60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases

50% test coverage

90% test coverage

Supported localizations were not tested

27 localizations supported by QA engineers

No automation testing

>1500 automated test scenarios created

Read Story

Test coverage :

97%

Before

After

Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities

Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release

The lack of test documentation

Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable

No Automation test coverage

Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times

Read Story

Releases per day:

Before

After

1 huge release every 1-2 months

4-5 releases per day

1 large team with an unclear scope of work

~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan

0 test cases

200+ e2e test cases for the whole app

1-2 months to release a new feature

2 weeks max to release a new feature

Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases

Clear and fast way to release any fix

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests

Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch

Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools

Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running

Tests took many hours to be completed

Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines

Read Story

Test coverage:

80%

Before

After

Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind

We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices

The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software

The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented

Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities

SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities

Read Story

Supported platforms:

Before

After

Developers were responsible for testing, and they executed it chaotically

>90% of the application was covered with test cases

Many bugs were overlooked during regular test runs

100% coverage was ensured for smoke and sanity testing

There was a lack of test documentation

>300 blocker issues were detected

There were many major and critical issues in a production environment

The number of customer support issues was reduced by more than 50%

Read Story

Parallel threads:

Before

After

Outdated BE autotests

All existing autotests are up-to-date

Only smoke tests were automated on BE

~2800 autotests added

No autotests on FE

>90% of test cases are automated

Manual smoke testing on FE

~99% of smoke tests are automated

Manual release testing

~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective

Read Story

Test coverage:

90%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch

There was no test documentation

Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios

Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality

Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern

Read Story

Test coverage:

>80%

Before

After

4 days were needed to run regression testing

~2 hours were needed to run regression testing

Regression tests were executed on one device only

5 various devices with different operating systems, screen resolutions, and browsers were used to run regression testing

There were less than 200 automated tests

>1000 automated tests were developed

1 browser was used

4 browsers were supported

Read Story

Test coverage:

99%

Before

After

There was no formal QA process

Manual story testing and verification was built from scratch

There was a lack of QA resources to test all platforms and product areas

99% of the application was covered with test cases and the smoke and regression checklists

The test documentation was incomplete

A well-structured test plan enabling thorough validation was created

Testing was executed by developers

A fully autonomous QA process was set up where QA engineers were fully responsible for testing

Read Story

Regression testing run:

Before

After

2 weeks were needed to run regression testing

<1 week is needed to run regression testing

Regression testing was performed only on 2 web devices

>6 various devices with the latest OS versions are used to run regression testing

There were no auto-tests

>150 automated tests have been created

>100 bugs have been reported

3 browsers are supported

2x faster task handling

Read Story

Test coverage:

>85%

Before

After

Regression testing was not executed

3 hours were needed to complete regression testing

The product contained a lot of bugs and had a bad UX

>300 functional and non-functional bugs were reported

There were no automated tests

350+ automation scenarios were created

Test coverage was low

>85% of the product was covered with automated tests

There were no test cases

350+ test cases were created from scratch

Read Story

Bugs reported:

>1000

Before

After

The QA process was unstructured and inconsistent

A QA team participates in creating ticket scope for upcoming releases

The previous QA team was not efficient enough

All the required test documentation has been rewritten

The test documentation was incomplete and out of date

>6,000 test cases have been written for a regression test suite for client applications

There were a lot of issues reported by clients

The DeviQA engineers have reduced the number of bugs reported by clients/therapists

Read Story

Test coverage of the API:

100%

Before

After

A bug-tracking system was not used

280+ regression E2EE cases have been created, which let a team reduce the time of regression testing to 1.5 days

There were no regression checklists

~40% of tests have been automated, and this value is growing

There was poor documentation coverage

100% of the core flow is covered with documentation

The tests were not automated

5+ performance suites have been created

Read Story

What you get

Average time saved by implementing our multithreaded test automation

300%

Reduction in your costs by using outsourced software testing

60%

Improvement in time to market for your products and projects

35%

Accelerate development by

30%

Increase test coverage to

95%

Enhancing project quality by

60%

Feel the improvement in

3 days

Reduce bugs up to

87%

Automation faster in parallel by

56x

QA tools & platforms we hold expertise in

Automation Testing

Cucumber

Selenium

Appium

Mocha

Playwright

Robot Framework

Specflow

TestNG

WebdriverIO

Selenide

Calabash

Watir

Codeception

Cypress

Security Testing Tools

HCL AppScan

Nessus

NMAP

BurpSuite

Acunetix

OWASP ZAP

Metasploit

Wireshark

DBeaver

Rdp-Sec-Check

SNMPCHECK

AiR

SSLSCAN

Performance Testing Tools

JMeter

Load Runner

Visual Studio

API Testing

Rest API

GraphQL

Apiary

Bluetooth Low Energy API

Apple Pay

Google Pay

Apple Maps

Fingerprint API

API Testing Tools

Postman

Swagger

Charles Proxy

Ready API

ACCELQ

Katalon Platform

REST-Assured

Database Testing

SQL Server

MySQL

Oracle

PostgreSQL

Cassandra

MongoDB

RethinkDB

Amazon S3

Redshift

DynamoDB

Amazon RDS

DocumentDB

Amplify

Lambda

Amazon EC2

Elasticache

Azure Datalake

Blob Storage

CosmosDB

SQL Database

Synapse Analytics

Google Cloud SQL

Google Cloud Datastore

Book a call to optimize your testing strategy and maximize ROI

Here’s what people are saying about DeviQA

“It was so easy to integrate your people with us and we didn't have any problems.”

Janosch Greber

VP of Engineering at RealTyme

“DeviQA did an excellent job, and I highly recommend them.“

DeviQA helped develop a cybersecurity software platform. Complex automated scenarios test REST APIs through a Faraday library. An SDK application works with Azure, Google Cloud, Docker, and LXC containers.

Yuval Or

QA Manager at Mimecast

Open details

“Devico has always brought us really high quality candidates for us to be able to seamlessly mesh into our team.”

Danny He

CEO and Founder at Soapbox

Certifications

ISO 9001:2015

At DeviQA, we take pride in being an ISO 9001:2015 certified company. This certification represents our unwavering commitment to maintaining the highest standards of quality in every aspect of our software testing services. With a focus on customer satisfaction, we adhere to internationally recognized quality management practices to ensure that our clients receive exceptional and reliable testing solutions. Through continuous improvement and compliance with regulatory requirements, we consistently deliver top-notch testing services that exceed our clients' expectations

ISO 20000

We understand the crucial role of IT services in modern businesses. As an ISO 20000 certified company, we excel in delivering efficient and effective IT services to our clients. Our customer-centric approach enables us to tailor our testing solutions to suit your unique requirements, ensuring a seamless integration of testing processes into your software development lifecycle. With a focus on continual service improvement, we optimize our IT Service Management practices to guarantee a smooth and satisfying experience for our valued clients

ISO 27001

The security of our clients' data is of paramount importance to us. As an ISO 27001 certified company, we go above and beyond to protect sensitive information and ensure the confidentiality and integrity of all data entrusted to us. With our robust Information Security Management System (ISMS), we implement stringent security controls, evaluate risks, and take proactive measures to safeguard against potential threats. Rest assured that partnering with us means your valuable data is handled with the utmost care and subject to the highest security standards

ISTQB

As a testament to our team's expertise and commitment to excellence, our software testing professionals hold the esteemed ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) certifications. The ISTQB certification is a globally recognized standard for software testing professionals, signifying their proficiency in the latest testing methodologies, best practices, and industry standards. With ISTQB-certified experts on board, we bring a wealth of knowledge and skills to every testing project, ensuring thorough and precise testing to uncover even the most intricate software defects. Partner with us and benefit from our skilled ISTQB-certified professionals who are dedicated to elevating the quality and reliability of your software products

Awards and recognitions

Leading Testing Provider by SoftwareTestingNews in 2021

Top Software Testing and QA Company by Superbcompanies in 2023

Finalist of the European Testing Awards in 2019

Finalist of the Software Testing & QA Awards in 2019

Collaboration process overview

1. Initial contact

During our initial call, we aim to understand your testing requirements and goals

2. Assessment

We evaluate your current testing process and create a tailored plan to enhance it

3. Proof of Concept

We offer a complimentary Proof of Concept, allowing you to experience our proficiency and expertise

4. Trial and evaluation of performance

We start a trial period with you, and once complete, we review the results together and discuss options

5. Contract signing and full-scale QA implementation

Upon mutual agreement, we move forward with the QA process by signing a contract and beginning work

6. Partnership with flexibility

Our engagement options give you commercial flexibility to dial up and dial down resources depending on your own needs

Let’s schedule a call

Flexible collaboration options allow you to choose the level of support that best meets your needs

Frequently Asked Questions

faq

FAQ

Why do we need QA control and advisory services if we already have an in-house QA team in place?

Sometimes, in-house teams can become too entrenched in existing processes and may overlook potential improvements. QA control and advisory services offer an external perspective, bringing fresh insights and expertise to enhance your QA practices.

Can QA control and advisory services help us integrate QA practices with agile or DevOps methodologies?

Absolutely. Our team specializes in Agile and DevOps methodologies, ensuring seamless integration of QA processes into your development lifecycle. We provide strategic guidance and practical solutions to optimize QA within these methodologies.

What tangible results can we expect from QA control and advisory services?

QA control and advisory services can significantly improve overall product quality, reduce time-to-market, minimize risks, and enhance customer satisfaction. Our services aim to deliver measurable results that positively impact your bottom line.

Can QA control and advisory services assist with regulatory compliance?

Yes, we have extensive experience in ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and quality standards across various industries. Whether it's FDA regulations for healthcare products or ISO standards for software development, we provide expert guidance and mitigate risks.

What level of involvement is required from an internal team when engaging with QA control and advisory services?

We believe in a collaborative partnership. While we take the lead on QA initiatives, we value the input and participation of your internal team. Your domain expertise is invaluable in understanding your business context and goals. We work closely with your team to ensure alignment, transparency, and knowledge transfer throughout the engagement process.